16) Also leaves room for the idea that “true” may be applied to people (a “true friend”) as well as to thoughts Two main versions of Correspondence Theory: object-based, and fact-based (currently prominent) Ĭorrespondence Theory Strengths: Simplicity Appeal to common sense Weaknesses Difficulties pertaining to linguistics Falls prey to circular reasoning Awkwardness in application to mathematics Leads to skepticism about the external world Ĭorrespondence Theory - Strengths Simplicity Appeal to Common Sense In order to prove that “It is raining today” is true, according to the correspondence theory, all one must do is look out the window and verify that it is in fact raining According to Descartes, “I have never had any doubts about truth, because it seems a notion so transcendentally clear that nobody can be ignorant of it…the word ‘truth,’ in the strict sense, denotes the conformity of thought with its object” (‘ Letter to Mersenne: 16 October 1639,’ The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. Often traced back to Thomas Aquinas’ version: “A judgment is said to be true when it conforms to the external reality” ( Summa Theologiae, Q. Correspondence Theory The dominant theory, especially popular with empiricists Correspondence Theory proposes that a proposition is true if it corresponds to the facts Example: “The apple is sitting on the table” can be true only if the apple is in fact sitting on the table.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |